Pro animal research articles

Better to use animals than humans for testing, right. So here is a short list which we will be adding to over time of reasons to support animal experiments.

One such alternative that should be given full support is the microfluidic chip, also known as organs on a chip. But the real highlight is that vivisection helped kept endangered species, such as the California condor, the tamarins of Brazil, and the black-footed ferret, from becoming extinct.

Studying interrelated processes is also best done in subjects with endocrine system, immune system, and central nervous system, something humans and animals have. This is why animal testing is endorsed by the American Veterinary Medical Association.

The preparation led to mass poisoning causing the deaths of more than a hundred people. The preparation led to mass poisoning causing the deaths of more than a hundred people. Testing a drug for side effects, for example, requires a circulatory system that will carry the drug to different organs.

Plenty of animal lives are wasted Considering all the tests that failed, not to mention other non-experimental factors that affect animals, there is a significant number of animal lives wasted for nothing.

Most medical products and treatments that are used nowadays will not be used if not for animal experimentation. Other species are used only when necessary.

By employing the 3Rs when continuing to use animals for scientific research, the scientific community can affirm its moral conscience as well as uphold its obligation to humanity to further the advancement of science for civilization and humanity.

Plenty of animal lives are wasted Considering all the tests that failed, not to mention other non-experimental factors that affect animals, there is a significant number of animal lives wasted for nothing.

Combined with blood analysis, results will be produced. This is sad because research into the physiological underpinnings of addiction can aid the development of more effective treatment programs.

Arguments For Animal Research

A human body is extremely complex that cell cultures in a petri dish cannot provide sufficient test results or proof that a cure or product is effective.

Fewer animals are used in research than as food for humans Compared to the amount of chicken, cattle, sheep and pigs that humans eat, relatively few of them are used in experimentation. Without the decades of careful animal research undertaken by Bob Edwards, Gregory Pincus, Min Chueh Chang, and scores of their colleagues it is unlikely that IVF would ever have become a reality.

Both infants and the mentally handicapped frequently lack complex cognitive capacities, full autonomy, or even both of these traits. It was found to have an inhibitory effect on morning sickness, and hence, thousands of pregnant women took the drug to relieve their symptoms.

This new animal model for cystic fibrosis will be very useful for evaluating the safety and efficiency of new gene therapy techniques as the science advances.

Most of these experts use mice, goats and other animals to test different discoveries they had and learn whether their experimentations can be used with humans. In some cases, they can continue to study across several generations. There are less expensive alternatives to animal experimentation Despite what proponents insist, cell cultures in a petri dish, or in vitro in glass testing, are not exactly useless or insufficient.

A third principle is to ensure the best possible treatment of the animals used in a study. Animals are protected from abuse and mistreatment Contrary to what most opponents believe, animal research is highly regulated, with laws enacted to protect animals.

This is why mice and rats have been used for long-term cancer research. They can even produce results that are more relevant than animal experimentation.

Animal Testing and Medicine

Given that there are both pros and cons of the animal experimentation procedures, it is your decision whether you should be supporting this kind of experimentations or not. Those in favor of animal testing argue that experiments on animals are necessary to advance medical and biological knowledge.

The clips usually stay on for days, and to ensure the rabbits stay in place, they are incapacitated. One principle calls for the preferential research use of less complex organisms whenever possible. This has led to the 3Rs campaign, which advocates the search 1 for the replacement of animals with non-living models; 2 reduction in the use of animals; and 3 refinement of animal use practices.

On Friday February 25th Pro-Test are holding a series of events to celebrate the progress Pro-Test has made over the last five years. In recent years, the practice of using animals for biomedical research has come under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups.

The same thing is true when using artificial human skin as a test subject, instead of animal skin. Opponents argue that there is really no evidence of its vital role in major medical advances. In particular the Nobel Assembly highlights how his experience with mice in enabled Bob Edwards to solve a critical problem that was preventing successful IVF, by developing a way to harvest human egg cells at the optimal stage of their maturation prior to in vitro fertilization.

Considering the enormous damage caused to society by addiction, and the high failure rate of addiction treatment programs, there is no doubt that addiction research is a neglected area within biomedical science. They called for avoiding the use of animals in experiments when a non-animal alternative is available, increased transparency regarding animal experiments and a greater willingness to negotiate with responsible representatives of the animal rights and welfare community about problems they have concerning animals in institutions.

With that in mind, the argument runs, it is best practice to act charitably and treat all humans as part of the moral community.

Animal experimentation up 73 percent, study says

This means reducing pain and suffering as much as possible. Use the links above to navigate this website. This is further supported by the study in the Archives of Toxicology that states that the lack of direct comparison of human data versus that of a mouse makes the usefulness of research data dubious.

In an article accompanying the study, Lisa Hara Levin of the animal welfare group Animal Care and Control of New York and William Reppy of Duke University said the study illustrated the need to.

May 05,  · The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is an animal-rights organization posing as part of the establishment. The members are against using animals for medical research. In recent years, the practice of using animals for biomedical research has come under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups.

Laws have been passed in several countries to make the practice more ‘humane’. To help scientists and others band together to defend animal research, Jentsch has formed Pro-Test for Science, an online group that holds rallies and counter-protests.

Jentsch spoke with the Monitor about his experiences and why it's vital for scientists to conduct research with nonhuman animals. "Despite new research technology, evidence that animal experiments often don't faithfully translate to humans, and the fact that a growing majority of the public opposes experiments on animals.

List of Pros of Animal Experimentation. 1. Contributes to many cures and treatments that save many human lives The majority of the medical breakthroughs that have happened in the last years were direct results from animal research and experimentation, according to the California Biomedical Research Association.

Pro animal research articles
Rated 4/5 based on 58 review
Animal Testing and Medicine